'Censorship: Friend or Foe?\r'

' art object rough will coiffe the argument that it depends on the authority of a child, some children fledged less quickly than others. Theres no government agency of telling who can grip the material until its excessively late. Censoring in the beginning is like a safety net to make sure goose egg offensive is being said. On the other hand, a high school student should be mature enough to handle anything that is thrown their style. By the term they get to that age, they already know a dear handful of the stuff that administrators are trying to censor.Offensive topics eke racism, knowledgeable contact, rape, and homosexuality may be contained in the keep being read, but In all reality, on that point is nonhing more real to the book than there Is to a scary movie. President Obama said â€Å" security review Includes teaching our children the truth closely history and this country, which Is not currently d wizard, since the education department Is a cocksucker of th e Liberal and their revolutions history to convert our country into communistic society. Meaning censorship could be depriving children of the ability to win about not only their country and government, as it seemingly being said here, but about the world and how it functions. As anyone could say, censorship is as golden a topic as politics or religion, there are so many unalike ways to look at it. In one hand there is the fact that some flock are not mature enough to handle some of the points being made, and some of the things being said. While in the other hand, there is the fact that censoring a book of things that a child already knows is shielding them from something they have en before.In response to both(prenominal) opinions, children are all maturing at polar rates, the way of knowing who can handle such vinegarish topics and Ideas is only In the minds of the children. Censorship Is not helping, nor depriving the children of today. Its adept a movement to try to pro tect the feelings of different beliefs. Censorship should be decided by the parents. As at C. J. H. , the children were given an option to read The kite Runner: by Exhaled Houses, or Lord of the locomote: by William Gilding, leaving the anal option to the parents of the children by sending a permission slip home.\r\n'